I have a little trouble understanding my essay question.

This question is:
Is Macbeth a tragic hero according to the classical definition of the term or is he merely a monster? Does Shakespeare succeed in creating sympathy for Macbeth?

To repsond to this question in an essay, I was thinking to write as though the question just said "Is Macbeth a tragic hero?" Because I don't really know what it means by "according to the classical definition of the term" and is it relevant?

I haven't written an essay in over 2 months and I'm getting rusty already. This is how I was thinking of structuring my essay so far:

Intro

Main Body
1st Para: About how he was a tragic hero

2nd Para: A different point on how he was a tragic hero

3rd Para: About how sympathy is created for Macbeth - HE starts off as the 'good guy' and slowly turned bad

Conclusion

And while writing the essay, I'll give exmaples and points to say he WAS a tragic hero, but should I also try and argue why he WASN'T a monster?
I have all the points to say why he was a tragic hero, i.e, he was a noble and loyal general to start with, but his ambition along with the influences of Lady Macbeth and the witches, lead to his tragic death etc.

I think I get the idea of a tragic hero, but for my essay, should I have a point in there somewhere to argue how he is a tragic monster and not a monster, because the question asks "Is Macbeth a tragic hero.....or a monster?"

Please reread the question. It seems to me your choice is between these two:

* Macbeth is a tragic hero.
or
* Macbeth is a monster.

There's no such thing as a tragic monster, as far as I remember!

=)

sorry, a typo.

It was meant to say Tragic Hero, not tragic monster

To better understand your essay question and structure your essay effectively, let's break it down step by step:

1. Understanding the essay question:
The first part of the question asks whether Macbeth is a tragic hero according to the classical definition of the term or simply a monster. To answer this, it would be helpful to understand the classical definition of a tragic hero, which generally includes traits like nobility, a tragic flaw, reversal of fortune, and a moment of self-realization or awareness.

2. Analyzing the relevance:
The phrase "according to the classical definition of the term" suggests that the question expects you to assess whether Macbeth fits the criteria established by classical literary standards. It is indeed relevant because it challenges you to evaluate Macbeth's character against the traditional framework of a tragic hero.

3. Sympathy for Macbeth:
The second part of the question asks whether Shakespeare succeeds in creating sympathy for Macbeth. This requires you to analyze the techniques employed by Shakespeare to evoke compassion or understanding towards the character. You can focus on his initial portrayal as a noble and valiant warrior, his internal struggles, and the circumstances that led to his downfall.

Now let's discuss the structure of your essay:

Introduction:
In the introduction, provide general background information about the play, briefly introduce the concept of a tragic hero and its relevance to Macbeth, and state your thesis or the main argument you will present in the essay.

Main Body:
In the main body paragraphs, explore different aspects of Macbeth's character and his journey, focusing on whether he fits the definition of a tragic hero according to classical standards, as well as whether Shakespeare succeeds in creating sympathy for him.

1st Paragraph: Begin by explaining how Macbeth possesses the qualities of a tragic hero, such as his initial nobility and loyalty. Support your argument by referencing specific scenes or dialogues from the play that exemplify these traits.

2nd Paragraph: Explore another aspect that portrays Macbeth as a tragic hero. This could be his tragic flaw, the reversal of fortune he experiences, or his eventual self-realization. Provide evidence and analysis to support your points.

3rd Paragraph: Switch gears to discuss whether Shakespeare succeeds in creating sympathy for Macbeth. Examine how the playwright establishes Macbeth as a sympathetic character initially and the specific techniques used to evoke empathy. Analyze significant events or moments in the play that contribute to the readers or audience's understanding and feelings towards Macbeth.

Conclusion:
Summarize your main points and restate the thesis. Reflect on the question as a whole and offer your final thoughts on whether Macbeth qualifies as a tragic hero according to the classical definition and whether Shakespeare effectively generates sympathy for him. You can also address any contrasting viewpoints or nuances you've come across during your analysis.

Regarding your question about arguing why Macbeth wasn't a monster, it's always beneficial to consider multiple perspectives and present a balanced argument. While you should focus on showcasing Macbeth as a tragic hero, you can briefly address counterarguments or alternative interpretations of his character to demonstrate your understanding of the topic. However, ensure that your main argument and evidence consistently support the idea of Macbeth as a tragic hero.

Remember to provide specific examples from the play to support your arguments, analyze the significance of these examples, and maintain a clear and logical essay structure. Good luck with your essay!