When building arguments of importance, is it more important to be valid or sound?
http://www.answers.com/valid
http://thesaurus.reference.com/browse/valid
They are the same thing; you can tell because "valid" and "sound" are synonyms for each other.
Well is it more important to be vaild or sound?
If you are valid, you are also sound.
A valid argument is a sound argument. A valid argument is based on fact; a sound argument is based on fact.
Conversely, if an argument is not based on fact, it is unsound, not valid.
There IS no difference.
Another word for valid is deductive. Technically, they are close in meaning. However, they are not interchangable. Deductive (or valid)refers to how the conclusion must absolutely follow given the premises. Sound means that the premises and the conclusion are all actually true. I have to disagree with the both of you.
You're right Brandon. It is more important to be sound than valid when building arguments of importance.
When building arguments of importance, it is more important to be both valid and sound. However, if you had to prioritize one over the other, validity would be more crucial.
Let me explain what validity and soundness mean in the context of arguments:
1. Validity: An argument is valid if the conclusion follows logically from the premises. In other words, if the premises are true, then the conclusion must also be true. Validity focuses on the logical structure of the argument, ensuring that the conclusion is a result of the premises.
2. Soundness: An argument is sound if it is valid and all its premises are true. Not only does a sound argument possess a logical structure that leads to a true conclusion, but it also relies on true premises. Soundness adds an additional layer of confidence in the argument's reliability.
So why is validity more important than soundness in building arguments of importance?
Validity is crucial because it establishes a strong logical connection between the premises and the conclusion. If an argument is invalid, it means that even if all the premises are true, the conclusion may still be false. In such cases, the argument fails to offer a convincing or persuasive case.
On the other hand, soundness is essential for the overall strength and reliability of an argument. A sound argument not only satisfies logical validity but also relies on true premises. However, if an argument is valid but not sound, it means that the logical structure is intact, but at least one of the premises is false. While this makes the argument weak, it can still serve as a basis for further refinement.
To summarize, for arguments of importance, both validity and soundness are essential. Validity ensures the logical integrity of the argument, while soundness adds the critical aspect of relying on true premises. However, if you had to prioritize one, it is more important for an argument to be valid, as a sound argument with faulty logic is ultimately unpersuasive.