please look this over for me thanks

Confidentiality is the right of an individual to have personal, identifiable medical information kept private. Such information should be available only to the physician of record and other health care and insurance personnel as necessary. As of 2003, patient confidentiality was protected by federal statute. (my source here). Health care providers use the data for research, to collect reimbursement, coordinate diagnosis and treatment, conduct quality assurance and monitor other providers. Clinical data repositories and management systems will likely reduce health care costs and improve patient care. (my source here) The ethical opinion on computer confidentiality is covered by the American Medical Association AMA) principle of Patient Privacy and Confidentiality. Protecting the patient’s right to privacy is of utmost concern to the AMA Ethical Force Oversight Body. Their Main purpose is to “protect patient information from rapid evolution of health – care informatics and to monitor silent breaches of confidentiality.
Medical information about a patient's condition is a very sensitive issue that doctors should take into consideration. If there a case of possible corrections with Medical information, it is ethical to make visible the date and time of the made corrections. In this way, the medical data can be considered credible as well as the patient's concern can be given attention regarding the viability of the made corrections. Indeed, it is quite ethical if corrections concerning medical issues will always date and time stamped.
Privacy is not absolute, and must be balanced with the efficient provision of medical care and the availability of resources. (my source here) In this regard, the patient has the right to know that there is an existing computerized database that contain medical information about his her health. This is a very ethical way of being open to the patient's need to know his or her health condition as far as he or she and his or her physician is concerned.
The patient has to know as soon as possible any inaccurate information about his condition most especially if it his life is at risk. According to the AMA principles, (my source here) Physicians should inform patients of the limits of confidentiality protections and allow the patients to decide whether treatment outweighs the risk of the disclosure of sensitive information. A patient expects to have his or her privacy respected by the physician and should not be disappointed. If a record must be released, the patient should sign an appropriate release authorizing the disclosure of information in the medical record. However, general releases will not suffice for records containing HIV or other sensitive material.
Physicians have always had a duty to keep their patients' confidences. In essence, the physician's duty to maintain confidentiality means that a physician may not disclose any medical information revealed by a patient or discovered by a physician in connection with the treatment of a patient. In this regard, the patient's consent would be the greatest consideration of the physician to signal ones action to have computerized medical database be online to the computer terminal. According to (my source here) once the patient has given consent to release the record, the disclosure requirement may be mandatory for the holder of the medical record or merely permissive.
It has been viewed that the main concern is the welfare of the patient and to maintain trust and professionalism in the line of keeping medical data well. If ever there have been erased records by the computer service bureau it is more ethical to let the physician know the concern in this matter so that if ever the patient would confront the physician regarding important data that have been damaged, the physician can be prepared to back up the files with the first hand information and to access computer database that are stored in softcopies for the welfare of the patient. However, when patient's identifiable data is to be destroyed, it must be disposed of in a way that protects the confidentiality of the information. Employees must shred the data or in other ways disassociate the patient's name and medical record number from the data. (-my source here)
The identification of the individuals and organizations with access to the databases of a patient should be made clear between the physician and the patient. If the patient decided to know who these people are, then the physician don't have any right to withhold the interest of ones patient of knowing these people. Moreover, according to (my source here) confidential information also is disseminated through clinical repositories and shared databases. Sharing this information allows patients to be treated more efficiently and safely. The challenge for physicians is to utilize this technology, while honoring and respecting patient confidentiality.

AMA ethics opinion imply the safety of the patients welfare with regards especially to medical data that should be confidentially taken cared of by respective physicians with the sole consent of their patients. It was also mentioned that Physicians should have their contracts with system vendors, consultants, and all health care providers participating in a data repository reviewed by an attorney. They should also have comparable confidentiality and security policies; implement security controls over sensitive patient information (e.g., HIV status, pregnancy termination, and history of mental health problems or drug and alcohol abuse); maintain good system security; and train staff and secure agreements concerning confidentiality and security. It is also advisable to have security experts periodically assess the security of the clinical data repository and require that users who access the information sign appropriate user agreements.
Disclosure of public health data could be made only for purposes consistent with the original collection. Thus, data could be disclosed only where clearly necessary to avert a significant health risk, for the direct therapeutic benefit of the subject, or for surveillance. (-my source here). A patient's consent to disclosure of confidential information contained in a medical record may also be implied from the circumstances. For example, medical personnel directly involved in a patient's care or treatment generally have access to the medical record. Even if the patient has not expressly authorized disclosure of his or her medical record, such consent is implied from the patient's acceptance of treatment or hospitalization. Consent is also implied when a patient is transferred from one health care practitioner or facility to another. In such circumstances, disclosure of confidential patient information may be necessary to ensure continuation of patient care or treatment. State and federal statutes may also authorize or require disclosure of medical records to health care professionals or providers involved in the patient's treatment or upon transfer of the patient from one facility to another.
(my sources)

References:
here

Before I read through the entire work, please re-think some issues in the first paragraph:

Confidentiality is the right of an individual to have personal, identifiable medical information kept private. Such information should be available only to the physician of record and other health care and insurance personnel as necessary. As of 2003, patient confidentiality was protected by federal statute. (my source here).<~~"was protected"?? It isn't protected anymore? Also, any time you quote or paraphrase and then cite, you need to add your own explanation/interpretation of that source's words. You also need to make sure the information makes sense logically in the paragraph. If the sentence interrupts the flow of information, then it either needs to be deleted or moved. Health care providers use the data for research, to collect reimbursement, coordinate diagnosis and treatment, conduct quality assurance and monitor other providers. Clinical data repositories and management systems will likely reduce health care costs and improve patient care. (my source here)<~~Again, your interpretation of the quoted/paraphrased material is needed. And you need to make sure the idea fits at this point in this paragraph. If it doesn't, either move or remove it. The ethical opinion on computer confidentiality is covered by the American Medical Association AMA)<~~opening parenthesis is missing principle of Patient Privacy and Confidentiality. Protecting the patient's right to privacy is of utmost concern to the AMA Ethical Force Oversight Body. Their Main purpose is to "protect patient information from rapid evolution of health-care informatics and to monitor silent breaches of confidentiality.<~~What?? The last "sentence" doesn't make sense. Please rephrase.

Now -- go through the rest of the paper and check on all cited material. Have you added your own interpretation of that information? Have you checked to make sure that all sentences, including cited material, make sense in the sequence of sentences in that paragraph?

??

Based on the information provided, it seems that the main topic being discussed is patient confidentiality in the medical field. The text highlights the importance of keeping personal medical information private and the ethical responsibilities of healthcare providers in protecting patient privacy.

If you are looking for specific information or have questions about patient confidentiality, here are some key points to consider:

1. The right to confidentiality: Confidentiality is the right of an individual to have their personal, identifiable medical information kept private.

2. Federal protection: Patient confidentiality is protected by federal statute, specifically as of 2003.

3. Use of data: Healthcare providers use medical data for various purposes, including research, reimbursement, diagnosis, treatment coordination, quality assurance, and monitoring of other providers.

4. Ethical considerations: The American Medical Association (AMA) recognizes patient privacy and confidentiality as a key ethical principle. The AMA ensures the protection of patient information in the rapidly evolving field of healthcare informatics.

5. Corrections to medical information: If corrections are made to medical information, it is ethical to clearly indicate the date and time of the corrections. This ensures credibility and allows patients to be aware of any changes made to their medical records.

6. Balancing privacy and medical care: Privacy is not absolute and should be balanced with the efficient provision of medical care and the availability of resources.

7. Patient's right to know: Patients have the right to know about the existence of computerized databases containing their medical information. Openness and transparency regarding their health conditions are considered ethical.

8. Inaccurate information: If there is any inaccurate information about a patient's condition, especially if it puts their life at risk, physicians should inform the patient promptly.

9. Consent for disclosure: Physicians may need to disclose medical information to ensure continuity of care or transfer of a patient to another facility. In such cases, implied consent may exist, but explicit consent through a signed release form is required for certain sensitive information.

10. Confidentiality and security measures: Physicians should have contracts, confidentiality and security policies, and regular security assessments in place when using clinical data repositories. Staff should be trained, and user agreements should be in place.

11. Public health data: Disclosure of public health data should only be done for purposes consistent with the original collection, to avert a significant health risk, for the direct therapeutic benefit of the subject, or for surveillance.

It is important to note that specific legal regulations and guidelines may vary between jurisdictions, so it's always advisable to consult local laws and regulations for accurate information.

Please ensure that you properly cite any sources used in your research, as it is important to acknowledge the original authors and provide references for your information.