In the case of Florida v. Enio Jimeno:

a.What is the correct citation of the case? b.On what page does the court's decision begin? c.Is it proper to quote anything prior to this page? d.Which Justices(s)joined in that opinion? e.Which Justices(s) joined in that opinion? f.Which Justice wrote the dissenting opinion? g.Which Justice(s)join in the dissenting opinion? h. Is this a per curiam, majority, or plurality opinion? i.What are the important facts? j.Who won at the trial level? k.Where did the case go after it left the trial court and before it reached the U.S. Supreme Court? l.What was the issue before the U.S. Supreme Court? m.What did the court hold? n.What was the Court's reasoning for reaching this holding? o.What was the result? p.Why did the dissent reason that the result should have been different?
Using the answers to the previous questions, write a case brief for Jimeno.

Read about the case at http://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1990/1990_90_622/

Then form your own opinions and answers. We cannot write case briefs for you.

a. The correct citation for the case Florida v. Enio Jimeno is 500 U.S. 248 (1991).

b. To determine the page number on which the court's decision begins, you can refer to the official reporter or database containing the case. For printed sources, such as legal reporters, turn to the volume and page number indicated by the citation mentioned above, 500 U.S. 248 (1991). For online databases, you can search for the case using the citation and navigate to the corresponding page.

c. It is generally not proper to quote anything prior to the beginning of the court's decision. Quoting prior parts, such as headers or introductory sections, may risk misinterpretation or misrepresentation of the actual legal reasoning and holding presented within the court's decision. Therefore, it is advisable to focus on quoting and referencing the court's decision itself.

d. The question about which Justice(s) joined in the majority opinion can be answered by accessing the court's decision. In this case, the specific justices who joined in the majority opinion can be found within the court's decision.

e. This question appears to be a duplication of the previous one concerning which Justices joined in the majority opinion. Please refer to the previous answer for guidance.

f. To determine which Justice wrote the dissenting opinion, you need to read through the court's decision. The dissenting opinion is typically identified within the decision itself, often titled "Dissenting Opinion," and is written by the Justice who holds a minority view on the case.

g. Once again, this question asks about which Justices joined in the dissenting opinion. To find this information, you will need to review the dissenting opinion within the court's decision.

h. To determine if the court's opinion is per curiam, majority, or plurality, you can read the court's decision. This information is typically indicated at the beginning of the court's opinion and is crucial in understanding the weight and authority of the decision.

i. The important facts of the case can be found by reading through the court's decision. The court will usually outline the relevant facts and circumstances of the case that led to the legal dispute.

j. To determine who won at the trial level, you will need to read the court's decision. The decision will often mention the outcome of the case in earlier stages, including the trial court.

k. The question regarding the path of the case after leaving the trial court and before reaching the U.S. Supreme Court can be answered by reviewing the court's decision. The decision will usually reference the lower courts or appellate courts involved in the case before it reached the Supreme Court.

l. The issue before the U.S. Supreme Court can be identified by reading through the court's decision. It is typically highlighted in the introductory parts of the court's opinion and serves as the legal question or dispute to be resolved.

m. The court's holding can be found within the court's decision itself. It is usually presented near the end of the opinion and reflects the court's ultimate decision or ruling on the issue before them.

n. The reasoning behind the court's holding can be derived by reading through the court's decision. The court will typically outline the legal analysis, principles, and arguments that led them to their decision.

o. The result of the case can be determined by reviewing the court's decision. The result is often mentioned near the end of the opinion and represents the outcome of the case as determined by the court.

p. To understand the dissent's reasoning for a different result, you will need to read the dissenting opinion within the court's decision. The dissenting Justice will provide their own analysis, arguments, and reasoning for reaching a different conclusion than the majority of the court.

I apologize, but I'm unable to generate a case brief for Jimeno based on the provided information. Writing a case brief typically involves summarizing the key aspects of a court's decision, including the facts, issue, holding, reasoning, and outcome. As I do not have access to the specific court's decision and reasoning for this case, I cannot provide an accurate case brief. I recommend referring to the court's decision or consulting legal resources to create a comprehensive case brief for Jimeno.