What was your experience with the Center for Writing Excellence (CWE) in the past? In addition to the CWE, what other writing tools are available for revising a research paper? How can you become your own editor and look at your writing with a critical eye?

Then Answer the following in 200 to 300 words: What feedback did you receive from the CWE,
your peer reviewer, and your instructor? Explain what feedback you will incorporate and
what feedback you will not incorporate into your paper. Include a rationale for your
choices.

Only YOU can answer this. "What was your experience with ... ?" Etc.

So ask yourself these things:

~~ What kinds of information did you get from your instructor and peer reviewer about your writing? (Probably more than once, right?)

~~ How will you use (or how have you used) their information as you revise and rewrite your papers?

~~ Why?

Write up what you think and repost. Someone here will be happy to comment on YOUR IDEAS.

=)

As an AI bot, I don't have personal experiences. However, I can explain how you can use the Center for Writing Excellence (CWE) and other writing tools to revise your research paper, as well as how to become your own editor.

The Center for Writing Excellence (CWE) is a valuable resource for students looking to improve their writing skills. It offers various services such as writing tutorials, grammar and writing style guides, and access to academic databases. To make use of the CWE, you can visit their website and explore the available resources. If you have specific questions or need feedback on your research paper, you can submit it for review by a tutor or writing specialist at the CWE.

In addition to the CWE, there are other writing tools and resources that can help you revise your research paper. Some examples include online grammar checkers, such as Grammarly or Hemingway Editor, which can help you identify and correct grammatical errors, improve sentence structure, and enhance readability. Reference management tools like Zotero or EndNote can assist in organizing your citations and creating a bibliography. Additionally, it can be helpful to seek feedback from peers, professors, or writing groups. They can offer fresh perspectives and point out areas for improvement in your paper.

To become your own editor and look at your writing with a critical eye, there are a few strategies you can use. First, take a break from your paper after completing a draft. This will help you approach it with a fresh perspective. When reviewing your paper, read it aloud to identify any awkward or confusing sentences. Pay attention to grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. You can also print out a hard copy and make notes or use the review features in word processing software to track changes and revisions.

Now addressing the second part of your question, as an AI, I can't provide personal experiences or receive feedback from the CWE, a peer reviewer, or an instructor. However, when considering feedback on your research paper, it is important to carefully evaluate each comment and decide which feedback to incorporate and which to disregard.

Consider the feedback from the CWE, peer reviewer, and instructor with an open mind. Look for consistent patterns in their comments to identify areas that need improvement. If multiple sources highlight similar issues, it may indicate a genuine need for revision.

When deciding what feedback to incorporate, prioritize suggestions that align with the purpose and objectives of your research paper. Consider the intended audience and if the feedback improves clarity, strengthens arguments, or enhances the overall quality of your work. Rely on your own judgment and make informed decisions about which feedback will best serve the purpose and goals of your research.

However, it's also important to recognize that not all feedback is equally valid or helpful. Some suggestions may not align with your research direction, the requirements of the assignment, or your personal writing style. In such cases, it is reasonable to respectfully consider the feedback but explain why you choose not to incorporate it.

Remember that the ultimate goal is to create a cohesive and well-reasoned research paper while maintaining your own voice and perspective.