Discuss the effects of consent as a defense to an intentional tort.

See http://www.lexisnexis.com/lawschool/study/outlines/html/torts/torts02.htm

for a discussion

Consent is a legal concept that plays a significant role in the defense to intentional torts. It essentially means that an individual has given voluntary approval for an action or behavior that would otherwise be considered a tortious act. When it comes to intentional torts, the effects of consent are crucial in determining whether liability can be imposed on the defendant.

To understand the effects of consent as a defense to intentional torts, it's important to define what intentional torts are. Intentional torts are wrongful acts that are committed intentionally, causing harm or injury to another person. Examples of intentional torts include assault, battery, false imprisonment, trespassing, and defamation.

The effects of consent depend on the specific tort in question:

1. Assault and Battery: Consent is a complete defense to assault and battery claims. If the plaintiff consented to the harmful or offensive contact that forms the basis of the claim, the defendant cannot be held liable. However, for the consent to be valid, it must be voluntary, informed, and given by someone with legal capacity. Consent obtained through fraud, duress, or coercion is not valid.

2. False Imprisonment: Consent can be a defense to false imprisonment if the plaintiff voluntarily consents to being confined. For example, if someone willingly enters a store and is asked to remain inside temporarily, they have given their consent to the confinement, thus barring a false imprisonment claim.

3. Trespassing: Consent is usually a valid defense against trespassing claims. If the person who enters or remains on another's property has obtained permission or has a lawful reason to be there, their actions may be deemed consensual and not tortious.

4. Defamation: Consent is typically not a defense to defamation claims. Consent cannot be given for statements that harm someone's reputation unless the statement is true or falls under qualified privileges, such as confidential communications or statements made in legal proceedings.

To determine whether consent is a valid defense, a court will examine the specific circumstances surrounding the case. The defendant bears the burden of proving that the plaintiff gave informed and voluntary consent to the act in question. It's important to note that consent can be withdrawn at any time, so the defendant's defense may not apply if the plaintiff withdrew consent before any harm occurred.

In summary, the effects of consent as a defense to intentional torts depend on the specific tort involved. Consent can serve as a complete defense in cases of assault and battery or false imprisonment if it is voluntary and informed. However, consent is generally not a defense to claims of defamation, and its validity as a defense in trespassing cases depends on the circumstances. The determination of whether consent is valid goes hand in hand with the evaluation of the specific facts and context of each case, which is typically done by a court or jury.