Posted by Christine Lange on .
How can a person distinguish between the prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices?
Critical thinking -
Here are previous answers to this question that I obtained via Google under the key words "'rhetorical devices' prejudice" to get these possible sources:
In the future, you can find the information you desire more quickly, if you use appropriate key words to do your own search. Also see http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
Critical thining -
A prejudicial statement is one that assumes a fact is true about something without any evidence to back up that belief. It is made with the goal of influencing the audience to believe as the speaker of the statement does.
Example: All Republicans will vote for Senator McCain because he is a Republican.
A non-prejudicial statement is one that is made based on facts with no slant to influence the audience one way or the other.
Example: Since I am a Republican, I will vote for Senator McCain.
Note: Democrats should feel free to substitute their candidate of choice in the above examples.