Investigative reporters are bolder today than they were 30 or 40 years ago. How do you think the impact of Watergate has contributed to this boldness? Do you think investigative reporters are justified in being bold to get information for the public, or do you think they are too aggressive?
Yesterday you said that GuruBlue's answer was very helpful.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1213206811
You may also want to read this article.
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:j2dzCTCVYssJ:www.gwu.edu/~smpa/faculty/documents/Harvard.pdf+investigative+reporting+aggressive&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=2&gl=us&ie=UTF-8
How do you think the impact of Watergate has contributed to this boldness? Do you think investigative reporters are justified in being bold to get information for the public, or do you think they are too aggressive?
The impact of Watergate certainly contributed to the increased boldness of investigative reporters today. Watergate was a scandal in the early 1970s involving the break-in at the Democratic National Committee headquarters by members of President Richard Nixon's administration. This event led to a series of investigative reports by journalists, ultimately resulting in the resignation of President Nixon.
The Watergate scandal highlighted the power of investigative journalism in holding government officials accountable. It demonstrated the significant impact that in-depth reporting can have on uncovering corruption, abuse of power, and ensuring transparency in government. The exposure of this scandal inspired many journalists to pursue investigative reporting as a way to serve the public interest by revealing and challenging the actions of those in authority.
As to whether investigative reporters are justified in being bold to get information for the public or if they are too aggressive, it is a complex question with varying perspectives. Investigative journalism plays a vital role in democracy by uncovering important facts, exposing wrongdoing, and providing valuable insights to the public. It serves as a check on power and helps maintain transparency and accountability. The boldness of investigative reporting, including tactics like whistleblowing and confronting powerful individuals, can be necessary to obtain information that might otherwise remain hidden.
That being said, the balance between boldness and aggression is crucial. Investigative reporters should adhere to ethical guidelines, such as verifying information, protecting sources, and reporting without bias. They should also consider potential consequences and ensure they are not crossing ethical boundaries, such as invading privacy or engaging in harassment.
Ultimately, the boldness of investigative reporters can be justified when committed to uncovering the truth, safeguarding democracy, and serving the public interest. It is essential, however, that they maintain professionalism, adhere to ethical standards, and use their authority responsibly.