how did the judge find out about the rotten milk

To understand how the judge found out about the rotten milk, we can assume that there was a legal case or situation involving the milk. Here's a step-by-step explanation of possible ways the judge might have discovered the issue:

1. Evidence or Witness Testimony: During the legal proceedings, someone might have presented evidence or witnessed the milk being spoiled. This could include photographs, videos, or documents proving the milk was rotten. Witnesses, such as employees, customers, or experts, might have testified about the condition of the milk.

2. Complaints or Reports: If customers or employees reported the spoiled milk to relevant authorities, such as health inspectors, food safety agencies, or local law enforcement, the judge could have been informed through these channels. Complaints can trigger investigations, which could lead to legal action.

3. Routine Inspections: Regular inspections might have been conducted by health agencies or regulatory bodies to ensure compliance with food safety standards. If the milk was found to be spoiled during one of these inspections, the judge might have been alerted as part of the standard protocol for addressing violations.

4. Laboratory Analysis: If a sample of the milk was sent to a laboratory for testing, and the results showed it to be rotten or contaminated, the judge might have been informed of these findings during the legal proceedings.

5. Legal Representatives: The legal representatives for the parties involved, such as the prosecution and defense attorneys, might have presented evidence of the rotten milk during the trial. This evidence could have been discovered through any of the means mentioned above.

It's important to note that the specifics of how the judge found out about the rotten milk would depend on the context of the case and the legal processes followed.

Again, this is not math.

The judge could drink it, smell it or be told about it by a witness.

I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.