I have three questions, and I'm just really not sure how to answer any of them.

1. What position has the Dalai Lama taken on this issue?

2. Based on the human rights issues in Tibet, should the U.S. Olympic team boycot the Olympics in China? Why or why not?

3. Considering the human rights issues in Tibet, should the President of the United States attend the opening ceremonies of the Olympics in China? Why or why not?

(In question one, it's referring to the issue: Should American foreign policy towards China be based on human rights considerations for Tibet?)

Thank you so much in advance. (:

These sites will help you answer the first question.

http://www.tibet.com/dl/vienna.html

(Broken Link Removed)

The other two questions ask for YOUR opinions. We'll be glad to critique them if you post them.

Ugh! I cannot seem to answer the first question. I'm having quite some difficulty.

Apparently the Dalai Lama hasn't taken a public stand on U.S. foreign policy toward China. Check this article.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0415/p99s01-duts.html

1. To find out what position the Dalai Lama has taken on the issue of American foreign policy towards China based on human rights considerations for Tibet, you can start by researching recent statements, speeches, or interviews given by the Dalai Lama. Look for reliable sources such as reputable news outlets or official websites associated with the Dalai Lama.

Search for keywords such as "Dalai Lama," "China," "Tibet," and "human rights." By analyzing the information you gather, you should be able to determine the position that the Dalai Lama has taken on this specific issue. Be sure to critically evaluate the sources to ensure their credibility and accuracy.

2. Answering whether the U.S. Olympic team should boycott the Olympics in China based on human rights issues in Tibet requires an examination of various factors and perspectives. Here is an approach to consider:

First, research the human rights issues in Tibet, their severity, and the international consensus on the situation. This can be done by reviewing reports from reputable human rights organizations, governmental statements, and investigations undertaken by international bodies, such as the United Nations.

Next, explore the potential impact of a boycott on the situation in Tibet and the broader diplomatic relations between the U.S. and China. Consider the effectiveness of past boycotts and whether they achieved their intended goals.

Analyze arguments both in favor and against a boycott. Look for opinions from experts, scholars, and activists, as well as statements from political leaders and athletes. Consider the moral, ethical, and practical implications of a boycott, weighing the potential benefits against any negative consequences.

By examining these perspectives and evaluating the available information, you can form an informed opinion on whether the U.S. Olympic team should boycott the Olympics in China based on the human rights issues in Tibet.

3. Similar to the previous question, deciding whether the President of the United States should attend the opening ceremonies of the Olympics in China considering the human rights issues in Tibet involves considering multiple factors. Here is a suggested approach:

Start by researching the U.S. government's stance on human rights issues in Tibet and its overall foreign policy towards China. Examine official statements, policy documents, and actions taken by the U.S. administration in response to human rights violations.

Consider the potential consequences of the President's attendance or non-attendance at the opening ceremonies. Evaluate how this decision may impact diplomatic relations between the U.S. and China, the influence it may have on China's behavior, and the message it sends to the international community.

Look for expert opinions from scholars, foreign policy analysts, human rights organizations, and voices within the government itself. Consider arguments both for and against the President's attendance, including moral, political, and strategic considerations.

By gathering and analyzing this information, you will be better equipped to form an opinion on whether the U.S. President should attend the opening ceremonies of the Olympics in China, taking into account the human rights issues in Tibet. It is important to critically assess the credibility and reliability of your sources to ensure a well-rounded understanding of the topic.