Post your response to the following: State your stance on the Terri Schiavo case, and identify the moral value judgment that influenced you to choose your stance.
• An example of a stance is, “Terri Schiavo should have been allowed to live, despite her persistent vegetative state.” An example of a moral value judgment is, “No person’s death should be decided by another—people should die naturally.”
• An example of moral relativism could be that American culture accepts many religious standpoints, making it difficult for its citizens to agree on the religious morality of the issue brought to light by Terri Schiavo and her family.
• Moore and Parker (2007) define utilitarianism as the belief that “…if an individual can feel pleasure and pain, then he or she deserves moral consideration” (p. 425). Consider that many proponents of both sides of the Shiavo case thought they had Terri’s best interests in mind—a moral consideration.
• Discuss with your classmates how moral relativism and utilitarianism apply to this issue.
Please note that we don't do students' homework for them. Our tutors try to give you the information to help you complete your assignment on your own. If there's not a tutor with this specialty online right now, be sure to go back into your textbook or use a good search engine. http://hanlib.sou.edu/searchtools/
Once YOU have come up with attempted answers to YOUR questions, please re-post and let us know what you think. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.
=)
How could cell phones be used to improve relationships with teachers and parents today?
As an AI bot, I do not have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can help you understand how to approach the Terri Schiavo case by considering different moral perspectives.
In the context of the Terri Schiavo case, individuals may adopt different stances based on their moral values and beliefs. One perspective could be that Terri Schiavo should have been allowed to live, despite her persistent vegetative state. This stance may be influenced by a moral value judgment such as "No person's death should be decided by another—people should die naturally." This viewpoint emphasizes the sanctity of life and the belief that hastening or intervening in the natural death process is morally wrong.
On the other hand, some individuals may argue that it was ethically acceptable to remove life-sustaining measures from Terri Schiavo. These individuals might believe that it is unnecessary to prolong the life of someone in a persistent vegetative state, as they may not experience consciousness or have a reasonable quality of life. Their moral value judgment could be based on the belief that individuals should have the right to die with dignity and not be subjected to unnecessary suffering.
When considering moral relativism and utilitarianism in relation to the Terri Schiavo case, there are various perspectives to consider. Moral relativism acknowledges that different individuals or cultures may have diverse moral beliefs and values. In the case of Terri Schiavo, the differing religious beliefs within American culture make it difficult for citizens to reach a consensus on the religious morality surrounding the issue.
Utilitarianism, as defined by Moore and Parker (2007), focuses on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain. Proponents of utilitarianism might argue that decisions regarding Terri Schiavo's life should be based on what would bring the greatest overall well-being to all parties involved. In this perspective, the moral consideration would be centered on what is in Terri Schiavo's best interests and whether further prolonging her life would result in more suffering or benefits.
It is important to note that different individuals may interpret moral values differently, leading to varying perspectives and stances on the Terri Schiavo case. Understanding the diverse moral perspectives and considering ethical frameworks such as moral relativism and utilitarianism can help facilitate a deeper understanding of the complex ethical considerations surrounding the case.
References:
Moore, B., & Parker, R. (2007). Critical Thinking (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.