Posted by maggie r on Saturday, April 19, 2008 at 5:00pm.
i am not quite clear why the No child left behind act has been called unconstitutional. Many articles that I've read say that it is because it requires states to pay to go forth with the program. It violates the spending clause but can anyone explain exactly which line of it.
Here is the spending clause for reference:
The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;
To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;
To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;
To provide and maintain a Navy;
To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of Particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards and other needful Buildings;--And
To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.
- history - Writeacher, Saturday, April 19, 2008 at 5:23pm
Perhaps it has to do with the absence of any education wording in the Constitution. Education has always been left up to each state to determine and control.
If something is not in the Constitution, then it cannot be called unconstitutional, right?
If I'm wrong, another teacher will correct me, but that's how I've always understood it.
Answer this Question
us history - How did the Supreme Court rule on the Indian Removal Act? is it ...
NCLB - i am studying the no child left behind act and i read that some states ...
president bush - can anyone help me find a quote from president bush and what he...
United States History - the least controversial actions of president bush ...
HISTORY - In 2001, President George W. Bush signed the Economic Growth and Tax ...
english - explanation and description no child left behind
Education - What was the impact of the No Child Left Behind positve and negative
English Essay:NCLB - can some proofread my paragraph it is for a persuasive ...
history - 12. Link Past and Present In 2001, President George W. Bush signed the...
american history - 1. Which of the following was not part of Britain's new ...
For Further Reading