Psychologists attempt to explain human behavior by explaining ("USING AN ANALOGY OF"?)the ensemble of ("HOW") the mind and brain who ("THAT", WHO REFERS TO PERSONS.) work together like a concept (SP) violonist with a stratevarious (SP AND CAP). In addition, Psychologists, (NO COMMA OR CAP) also try to understand ("THE ROLE"?)the functions play in social behavior and dynamics. Nature versus nurture is one of the major debates within the field of psychology (THIS FOLLOWING PHRASE IS UNCLEAR.) because of ideas that controverse (SP) their approach to the world. Nature versus nurture is an expression that is relative to somebodies (SP, POSSESSIVE) inner personality as appose (SP) someone's experiences in determining their physical and behavioral traits. (THIS STATEMENT IS UNCLEAR.) Our (BY "Our", DO YOU MEAN HUMAN? HOW DOES IT COMPRISE ALL ORGANISMS?)nature comprises all living organisms and non-living components in order to get a relation between biotic ("BIOLOGICAL"?) and non-biotic aspects. As a result, I would define nurture as someone (POSSESSIVE) personal experience in life. The interaction between genetic potential, environmental influences and personal choice relatively relies on socio-economic environment. (DOESN'T IT ALSO INCLUDE NON "socio-economic" APSECTS LIKE CLIMATE, TOPOGRAPHY AND SO ON?)
In my opinion, I think biology is destiny because we cannot debate or understand what causes this person to be a criminal. (IS THIS ONLY RELATED TO CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR?) In reality, people are just hooked to their genes.
YOU SEEM TO CONTRADICT YOURSELF, SAYING "relies on socio-economic environment" AND THEN "people are just hooked to their genes." YOU HAVE THE CHOICE OF PICKING ONE OR THE OTHER, OR VIEWING THEM AS INTERACTING.
IT MIGHT HELP YOU TO USE A SPELL CHECKER PROGRAM TO PICK OUT SOME OF YOUR SPELLING ERRORS.
HERE IS AN ARTICLE THAT MIGHT BE HELPFUL:
In the future, if nobody is available to proofread your work, you can do this yourself. After writing your material, put it aside for a day — at least several hours. (This breaks mental sets you might have that keep you from noticing problems.) Then read it aloud as if you were reading someone else's work. (Reading aloud slows down your reading, so you are less likely to skip over problems.)
If your reading goes smoothly, that is fine. However, wherever you "stumble" in your reading, other persons are likely to have a problem in reading your material. Those "stumbles" indicate areas that need revising.
Once you have made your revisions, repeat the process above. Good papers often require many drafts.
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.