Which dynasty may be the first real dynasty but there is no proof that it existed?

I think the answer is Pharanic dynasty. Is this correct???

Yes, you're right. The first dynasty was in Egypt, starting about 3,000 B.C. The Babylonian dynasty was started about 1,000 years later.

http://touregypt.net/hdyn1.htm

The Pharaonic dynasty is not the first real dynasty, as there is substantial evidence of the existence of ancient Egyptian dynasties. However, if you are specifically looking for a dynasty that is considered to be the first but lacks concrete proof of its existence, you might be referring to the Xia Dynasty in Ancient China.

The Xia Dynasty is believed to have ruled China from around 2070 to 1600 BC. It is considered the first dynasty in Chinese history, according to traditional historical accounts. However, while there is evidence of early civilizations in ancient China during this time period, the existence of the Xia Dynasty itself remains a subject of debate among historians.

The absence of conclusive archaeological evidence and limited historical records make it challenging to verify the existence of the Xia Dynasty. Many of the accounts about the Xia Dynasty come from ancient texts like the "Bamboo Annals" and "Records of the Grand Historian" written centuries after its supposed reign.

To address this question or explore more on the existence of the Xia Dynasty, you could delve into scholarly debates, archaeological findings, and historical records to understand the different viewpoints and interpretations surrounding it.