We'll be glad to HELP you paraphrase. You start with your ideas and words -- and we'll be glad to work with you from there.
Secular arguments from finality are almost always combined with consideration about the fallibility of judicial institutions and doubt whether people who are accused of crimes are fully responsible agents.
Thanks to whoever can paraphrase this. It is in regards to the death penalty(my thesis)
Because of this fragility, it would seem obvious that of overarching importance
are Mali’s stewardship of its land and the development of its land tenure system, with all
they imply for its social, legal and economic systems. In a very general sense and in
broad historical scope, the African conception of land tenure and private property was
that the land belonged not to an individual, but to a collective. It was received in trust
from a sacred deity, passed down from the village founder to the present-day village or
land chief, and held in trust for generations yet unborn. Man was simply a usufructuary.
That he could be the owner not only of the harvest produced by the land, but also of the
land itself was not African and was not Bambara, the major ethnic group in Mali.
The juvenile justice system was originally created to provide individualized rehabilitation to offenders of minor crimes such as truancy, shoplifting, and vandalism. But youth today are taking advantage of this lenient and outdated system and are committing violent crimes because they believe they will get off easy. In order to provide justice to victims and their families and to prevent more and more juveniles from committing violent crimes, the United States must hold criminals accountable—regardless of their age—and impose a tough punishment system. To that end, juveniles should sometimes be tried as adults
"The FDA receives pressure from lobbyists for pharmaceutical companies to push through the companies' own drugs or hold back approval of competitors' drugs."
Other predictors of procrastination include: task aversiveness, impulsiveness, distractibility, and how much a person is motivated to achieve. Not all delays can be considered procrastination; the key is that a person must believe it would be better to start working on given tasks immediately, but still not start.
"A good writer is one you can read without breaking a sweat. If you want a workout, you don’t lift a book—you lift weights. Yet we’re brainwashed to believe that the more brilliant the writer, the tougher the going."
"The truth is that the reader is always right. Chances are, if something you’re reading doesn’t make sense, it’s not your fault—it’s the writer’s. And if something you write doesn’t get your point across, it’s probably not the reader’s fault—it’s yours. Too many readers are intimidated and humbled by what they can’t understand, and in some cases that’s precisely the effect the writer is after. But confusion is not complexity; it’s just confusion. A venerable tradition, dating back to the ancient Greek orators, teaches that if you don’t know what you’re talking about, just ratchet up the level of difficulty and no one will ever know."
"Don’t confuse simplicity, though, with simplemindedness. A good writer can express an extremely complicated idea clearly and make the job look effortless. But such simplicity is a difficult thing to achieve because to be clear in your writing you have to be clear in your thinking. This is why the simplest and clearest writing has the greatest power to delight, surprise, inform, and move the reader. You can’t have this kind of shared understanding if writer and reader are in an adversary relationship." (pp. 195–196)
Source: O’Conner, P. (2003). Woe is I: The grammarphobe’s guide to better English in plain English. New York: Riverhead Books.