Posted by Anonymous on Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 1:08pm.
I was about to comment on your grammar, but by the time I finished reading it, was more upset by upset your buying the argument that climate change is "a lot of hot air". I certainly disagree with your statement "..the fact that (IPCC) scientists cannot find enough evidence to support their hypothesis." You wholeheartedly seem to be accepting the views of a few dingbats. That is your prerogative.
As far as grammar and spelling go, I suggest you substitute "people's" for "people"; "be" for "get", "projects" for "projectes"; "frog' for "fog"; "the scientific" for "scientist's"; "deadly" for "deathly". There are other errors as well, but that is a good beginning.
These sites will give you a more complete overview of this question.
http://blogs.chron.com/sciguy/archives/climate_change/
Contributed by Writeacher.
to drwls: this is a summary respone paper... i also disagree with the article...
Related Questions
Environmental Science - are these correct? 29. A common feature of thermal ...
Environmental Science - 29. A common feature of thermal pollution and artificial...
english - Can some read the paragraph below and check my grammars are correct. ...
Science 7R - HW Qs. Check! - 16. Coaches advise athletes to warm up or exercise...
College Biology - 1. WHat kind of vegetation (or biome) would be found on the ...
English - Bobpursley is correct. And here's a webpage that will give you ...
Science - Compare the nature greenhouse effect process with the human induced. 2...
EARTH SCIENCE - How are carbon dioxide and other trace gases thought to be ...
EARTH SCIENCE - How are carbon dioxide and other trace gases thought to be ...
global warming - hi im doing a debate tomorrow on global warming, i am arguing ...
For Further Reading