Posted by JESSICA on Saturday, March 8, 2008 at 2:08pm.
Neither are true, and neither are good arguments. Coal is more abundant now, and cheaper per energy produced if you are running a dirty coal powqer plant, but it is a worse source of pollution and the mnining of it is a worse environmental problem than offshore oil drilling. The second argument is even more ridiculous.
The technology to produce liquid fuels from coal (which are needed for transportation mainly) is available, but you yet economically competitive with petroleum. In another decade it may be.
Related Questions
science - which is probably the most significant argument against offshore ...
SCIENCE - FROM the point of view of an evriromentalist,which is probably the ...
social studies - From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is ...
social studies - From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is ...
social studies - From the point of view of an environmentalist, which is ...
science - from the point of view of a environmentalist , which is probably the ...
English II - I really need some help on a good thesis statement on offshore ...
world geography - the north european plain is rich in: a. coal, oil, copper, and...
check geo - the north european plain is rich in: A)coal, oil, copper, and ...
english - how to make this thesis on correct placement(Today the price of ...
For Further Reading
