When evaluating an argument with an unstated premise would the most approprate tactis be to don't do anthing? If the arguer had wanted a claim to be included, they would have included it. WOuld I them evaluated the argument as it stands?

I can't even imagine an argument with an unstated premise. Unless there's a claim or premise, there's no argument, is there?

http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/659/01/

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/composition/argument.htm

http://www.powa.org/content/blogcategory/21/111/

When evaluating an argument with an unstated premise, the most appropriate approach would not be to do nothing. Instead, you should consider the potential unstated premise and assess the argument based on the information provided.

While it is true that an arguer should ideally include all necessary claims to support their argument, it is possible for someone to unintentionally leave out a crucial premise. Therefore, it is your task as the evaluator to analyze the argument as it stands and determine its strength or weakness.

Here is a step-by-step approach to evaluating an argument with an unstated premise:

1. Identify the explicit premises: Start by identifying the claims or statements that are explicitly mentioned in the argument.

2. Determine the conclusion: Identify the main point or the conclusion that the arguer is trying to support.

3. Look for implied premises: Analyze the explicit premises and the conclusion to see if there might be any implied premises that are necessary for the argument to be logically valid. An implied premise is one that is not explicitly stated but is required for the argument to make sense.

4. Assess the validity and strength: Evaluate the argument's logical validity by determining whether the implied premise, if added, would make the argument logically sound. Additionally, consider the strength of the argument by assessing the relevance and sufficiency of the existing premises.

5. Consider counterarguments: Think about potential counterarguments or alternative explanations that could weaken the argument. Address these counterarguments to further assess the overall strength of the argument.

By following these steps, you can appropriately evaluate an argument with an unstated premise and make an informed judgment about its validity and persuasive power.

When evaluating an argument with an unstated premise, it is essential to employ critical thinking and appropriate tactics. Simply ignoring the unstated premise and evaluating the argument as it stands may not be the most effective approach. Here's a recommended step-by-step tactic for evaluating such arguments:

1. Identify the unstated premise: Look for any missing or implied information that is crucial to the argument's validity. It may be helpful to consider what assumptions are necessary for the argument to hold true.

2. Consider potential unstated premises: Analyze the argument to determine what additional claim or assumption would strengthen or support the argument's reasoning. Think about what the arguer may have intended to include but left unstated.

3. Evaluate the argument with the unstated premise: Once you have identified the potential unstated premise, assess how the argument stands when this premise is included. Determine if the inclusion of the unstated premise strengthens or weakens the argument.

4. Assess the validity of the argument: Examine the overall logic, evidence, and reasoning presented in the argument. Evaluate if the inclusion of the unstated premise strengthens the argument's validity or if it still remains weak.

Remember, while it is reasonable to assume arguers would include necessary claims, it's not always a valid assumption. People may overlook or assume others will understand certain premises. Therefore, it is crucial to critically evaluate and consider the potential impact of any unstated premises in an argument.