Why would anyone pay almost $300,00 for a pushcart license?
It is a high-traffic location with a wealty clientiele and, for people in Central Park, there is nowhere else to eat in that area except the expensive Tavern on the Green on the opposite side of the Park.
<<Who is obtaining the economic rent for the obviously lucrative pushcart location?>>
The city obtains the rent
<<How much economic profit is the pushcart owner probably earning?>>
Probably at least $400,000 per year before license fees and $122,000 after fees and other costs.
I must disagree with some of your answers. Economic Rent is not the same thing as Accounting Rent. Economic Rent is the value to a business from holding exclusive rights to an asset. In this example, its the value to having exclusive usage of the corner near Central Park for food services. Likely, economic rent is shared by the city and the pushcart owner. The pushcart owner is likely to get some of the rent because he was willing to shell out $300K. How much more we don't know. (Note that if the city issued the licence to the highest bidder at an auction, then the city would have optained nearly all of the economic rent as bidders would keep bidding up the price until the economic rent was exausted.
Second, economic profit is not the same as accounting profit. Economic profit for the pushcart owner is the amount above what he would have obtained if he did not buy the licence but did his next best activity. That is, economic profit = accounting profit minus opportunity cost.
In this example, its hard to tell what economic profit is likely to be. Mainly because we don't know what the economic value of having the exclusive licence.
I hope this helps.
Drwls and Economyst