Describe the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary, how they are connected, and how the statements have shaped American foreign policy.

http://www.google.com/search?q=monroe+doctrine&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7SUNA

and

http://www.google.com/search?q=roosevelt+corollary&rls=com.microsoft:en-us:IE-SearchBox&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=ie7&rlz=1I7SUNA

Once you get your ideas together, please post what you've written. Then someone here will be happy to comment on your thinking.

=)

The Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary are both important aspects of American foreign policy, with the latter being an extension of the former. Let's start by understanding what each doctrine is and how they are connected, and then discuss their impact on American foreign policy.

The Monroe Doctrine was a policy statement made by President James Monroe in 1823. It declared that any further colonization efforts by European powers in the Americas would be considered as acts of aggression against the United States. Essentially, the doctrine asserted that the United States would not tolerate European interference in the affairs of independent nations in the Western Hemisphere.

The Monroe Doctrine was primarily intended to protect both the newly independent Latin American countries and the United States' own interests in the region. It aimed to prevent European powers from establishing new colonies in the Americas, which could potentially pose a threat to the United States.

The Roosevelt Corollary, on the other hand, was an addition to the Monroe Doctrine introduced by President Theodore Roosevelt in 1904. It expanded upon the principles outlined in the original doctrine and asserted the United States' right to intervene in the affairs of Latin American countries to maintain stability and protect American economic interests.

The Roosevelt Corollary emphasized the United States' role as a regional power and allowed for military intervention to safeguard American interests if necessary. It was essentially an assertion of the United States' right to exercise its influence in the Western Hemisphere, often with an emphasis on maintaining political and economic stability in the region.

The Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary are connected because the latter was an extension of the former. While the Monroe Doctrine focused on preventing European colonization, the Roosevelt Corollary went a step further by justifying American intervention in other countries' affairs. Both doctrines were aimed at protecting American interests and asserting the United States' dominance in the Western Hemisphere.

These doctrines have significantly shaped American foreign policy. The Monroe Doctrine laid the foundation for the United States' involvement in Latin American affairs, establishing the country as a defender of the region's independence and proclaiming its interests as vital. The doctrine has since been referenced and invoked by subsequent presidents to justify various interventions and actions in the Americas.

The Roosevelt Corollary expanded upon the Monroe Doctrine by explicitly endorsing American intervention to maintain stability and protect economic benefits. It set the stage for a more assertive and interventionist foreign policy in the Americas, a policy that continued in the following decades.

Both doctrines have influenced American foreign policy in other regions as well. The Monroe Doctrine set a precedent for the United States to assert its dominance and protect its interests in other parts of the world. The Roosevelt Corollary reinforced this idea and contributed to the notion of the United States as a global power with interventionist tendencies.

In summary, the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary are interconnected doctrines that have shaped American foreign policy. The Monroe Doctrine focused on preventing European colonization in the Americas, while the Roosevelt Corollary extended this doctrine to justify American intervention in Latin American affairs. These doctrines have played a significant role in defining the United States' role as a regional and global power, setting the stage for an interventionist foreign policy that has had far-reaching consequences.