Posted by Charles on Wednesday, January 30, 2008 at 6:07pm.
<<10.070 why is it 5 sig fig's? the "0" on the right is useless.>>
The fact that the zero is there beyond the decimal point means that it IS a significant figure.
<<20.: Why is it only "1" sig fig? the "zero" is the difference between two and twenty.>>
I agree. With a decimal point after the 20, it should be clear that the number is closer to 20 than 19 or 21. Therefore there are two sig figs. However, if they had just written 20 without a decimal point, then that would be one significant figure. For example: 2000 with no decimal has only one sig fig. also.
<<0.01234 has "4" sig fig's. why isn't the zero to the right of the decimal sig?>>
Until you get a nonzero number on the left side, none of the figures are significant in terms of precision; they just establish the order of magnitude. Think of writing it as 1.234*10^-2. The exponent -2. does not establish the precision, only the 1.234 does.
Related Questions
Science (Chemistry!) - I just do not understand ANYTHING about multiplying/...
Science - I'm a little confused when it comes to significant figures. Where ...
Significant Figures - Report the following to two significant figures a. 3.1459...
Physics - Talking about significant figures, my Physics textbook lists 5 rules ...
math - write 480 in a) 1 significant figure b) 2 significant figures c) 3 ...
Chemistry - I have a Chemistry question which should be very simple but I do not...
Significant figures in chemistry - can someone please explain significant ...
Math - 1.2 (1+ 23.0 x 10-6/°C*50) Could someone solve this problem ...
Chemistry - Which contain 3 significant figures and no others? 1. 326.0 2. 0....
Significant figures - How would I go and express these numbers with 3 ...
For Further Reading
