Between New Nationlism and New Freedom which is the most realistic response to industrialization? Why?

New Nationlism

This looks like a DBQ essay. What sources are you supposed to use? To which countries/continents and time period does your question refer?

If you tell us the sources and give us some idea of which YOU think the most realistic response to industrialization is, we'll be glad to critique it.

I was thinking New Nationalism as well. This is not a DBQ. It is just a regular essay so my sources are my book and the internet. My book has a paragraph on each one. I have used that to compare and contrast the two but i am having trouble applying the information to the question.

What are the main features of each one? How do they address the problems of industrialization?

To determine which is the most realistic response to industrialization between New Nationalism and New Freedom, we first need to understand the principles underlying each ideology.

1. New Nationalism: This was a policy proposed by Theodore Roosevelt during his 1912 presidential campaign. It advocated for increased federal regulation and oversight of corporations and monopolies. It aimed to curb the power of big businesses and ensure fairness and economic justice for the working class.

2. New Freedom: This was the platform put forward by Woodrow Wilson during the same presidential campaign. It emphasized limited government intervention and the promotion of competition through the enforcement of antitrust laws. It sought to break up monopolies and encourage fair competition in order to enhance individual freedoms and economic opportunities.

Now, let's consider the question of which response is more realistic in addressing industrialization.

The New Nationalism approach is more realistic in responding to industrialization because it acknowledges the need for active government intervention and regulation to address the negative consequences of industrialization. Industrialization often leads to the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of a few, resulting in income inequality and exploitative working conditions. By advocating for increased federal regulation, New Nationalism aims to promote social justice and protect workers' rights. Additionally, it recognizes the importance of government intervention in addressing market failures and ensuring fair competition.

On the other hand, New Freedom's emphasis on limited government intervention may not be as effective in addressing the challenges posed by industrialization. Without strong regulatory measures, monopolies and predatory business practices can persist, hindering competition and economic opportunities for smaller businesses and workers. Limited government intervention may not sufficiently protect workers and consumers from exploitative practices or ensure equitable distribution of resources.

In summary, although both New Nationalism and New Freedom offer differing approaches to industrialization, the New Nationalism response is more realistic due to its recognition of the need for government intervention and regulation to curb the negative consequences of industrialization.