Investigative reporters are bolder today than they were 30 or 40 years ago. How do you think the impact of Watergate has contributed to this boldness? Do you think investigative reporters are justified in being bold to get information for the public, or do you think they are too aggressive?

I'm not sure that investigative reporters are bolder than they were a generation or two ago. They didn't uncover the misinformation that led us into the war in Iraq. In my opinion, investigative reporters fell down on that job and weren't bold enough.

A democracy depends upon a free press that investigates and reports what government and business officials don't want the public to know. We need more bold investigative reporters.

Although I deplore the press delving into personal lives, when it uncovers hypocrisy between a public official's public and private lives, then the citizens need to know.

The impact of Watergate has indeed contributed to the boldness of investigative reporters today. Watergate was a pivotal moment in journalism history, where journalists played a critical role in uncovering the truth behind the Watergate scandal that eventually led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon. This event showcased the power of investigative reporting and highlighted the importance of holding those in power accountable.

The Watergate scandal demonstrated the significant impact that journalism can have on society. It showed that journalists have the responsibility to dig deep, ask tough questions, and seek the truth in order to inform the public and uphold democracy. This revelation had a profound influence on subsequent generations of journalists, inspiring them to be more dedicated, assertive, and courageous in pursuing investigative stories.

Investigative reporters being bold to get information for the public can be justified in many ways. They often tackle crucial issues that would otherwise remain hidden or ignored, uncovering corruption, abuse of power, and systemic failures. By shedding light on such matters, they aim to protect the public interest and foster transparency. Their work can lead to positive change, accountability, and justice.

However, it is essential to distinguish between being bold and being aggressive. Investigative reporters must adhere to ethical standards and principles of journalism, such as accuracy, fairness, and respect for privacy. While being persistent in pursuing the truth is crucial, journalists should not cross ethical boundaries by invading privacy, resorting to sensationalism, or manipulating facts to fit their narrative. Responsible and ethical reporting is fundamental for maintaining credibility and upholding the trust of the public.

In summary, the impact of Watergate has unquestionably contributed to the increased boldness of investigative reporters today. Their boldness is justified as long as it is balanced with ethical standards, accountability, and respect for the public interest. The role of investigative reporters in holding the powerful accountable and uncovering truth remains vital for a functioning democracy.