Posted by Tabby on Sunday, December 16, 2007 at 10:40am.
I think you're right, if you measure financial success. When Vermeer died he left a large family and many debts.
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. Did you have financial gain in mind when you asked that question? Life for an artist is never easy, especially without a sponsor. Both Vermeer and Rembrandt van Rijn had personal tragedies and financial hardship. Vermeer, however, had fewer paintings but thoe he had madwe him one of the greates painters of the Dutch Golden Age, especially in his use lf light. Peter Paul Rubens,(not Rubeens) on the other hand, was prolific and had many apprendices and students. He did not paint all his works alone. I know far less about Georges de la Tour.
what is a lead-in ?
Related Questions
Art History - Using the careers of Jan van Eyck, Diego Velazquez, and Jan ...
Art Appreciation - Ruben and Rembrandt: Reflection and Temperament. Contrast The...
art 101 - Contrast The Elevation of the Cross by Rubens with Rembrandts ...
ELA - Where did Patrick find the letter in the book Chasing Vermeer?
art - Why is Rembrandt oftern referred to as the first "modern artist?"...
fisica 10mo - sobre una rueda de radio r=0.5 m esta enrollada una cuerda que se ...
French - You are on vacation in Paris, describe each attraction you visited. Can...
spanish - "¿Qué hay en _____ de la sección de ...
French 1 - Ils regardent les vetements pour hommes dans ______ de la boutique. a...
french - is this correct? Ashlee Simpson est la femme de Pete Wentz. Homer et ...
For Further Reading