I am doing a National History Day project this year on the topic of "From Conflict to Compromise" and my thesis statement has to be turned in tomorrow. Could someone check it and make sure it is arguable and true?
The inequality of women caused them to become activists in other reform movements which gave them the skills necessary to begin a movement of their own.
I know what I'm trying to say but sometimes I can't get it written clearly. I'm talking about the Seneca Falls convention that happened during the Reform Era in the US.
Maybe something like this is what you want to say...
The desire women had for equality pushed them to become activists in other reform movements before taking the ultimate step of challenging the inequality among genders.
Instead of genders, you may want to use sexes or men and women. You may even want to say challenge the double standard rather than what I've written above.
I would suggest that you add after" in other reform movements- Seneca Falls Convention as an example - which gave them the skills....etc.
That will clarify where you are going. Good thinking!
Sure, I'd be happy to help you with your thesis statement. Your thesis statement seems to be arguing that the inequality faced by women led them to become activists in other reform movements, which in turn provided them with the necessary skills to initiate a movement of their own, specifically referring to the Seneca Falls convention during the Reform Era in the US.
To evaluate if your thesis statement is arguable and true, we can break it down into different components and assess them individually:
1. "The inequality of women caused them to become activists in other reform movements": This part of your thesis states that women's inequality prompted them to join other reform movements. This is arguable as it suggests a cause-and-effect relationship between women's inequality and their involvement in other social causes. To support this claim, you could look for historical evidence such as examples of women's participation in other reform movements during the Reform Era.
2. "which gave them the skills necessary to begin a movement of their own": This portion suggests that through their involvement in other reform movements, women acquired the skills required to initiate their own movement. This claim is also arguable and might require further explanation or evidence. To strengthen this argument, you could provide specific examples of skills gained by women in other reform movements that were later applied during the Seneca Falls convention.
3. "The Seneca Falls convention happened during the Reform Era in the US": This is a factual statement referring to the historical context in which the Seneca Falls convention occurred. If you have done your research and the timing is accurate, this statement would likely be considered true.
In conclusion, your thesis statement seems to be arguable, as it suggests a causal link between women's inequality and their involvement in other reform movements, leading to the development of skills that eventually shaped the initiation of the Seneca Falls convention. However, it would be beneficial to provide supporting evidence or examples to strengthen your argument.