Who is a jounalist responsible to, they're employer or the viewing public?

I also need particular examples of when news has been withheld for the good of the public or vice-versa for profit/ratings.

if you can help then thanks :-)

Just some sources of info, maybe ideas, i have to do an in-class essay and im having a bit of trouble locating information

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journalism

These may help.

=)

A journalist has responsibilities to both their employer and the viewing public, but there can be instances where these responsibilities may come into conflict. Let me explain further.

1. Responsibilities to the employer: Journalists are typically employed by media organizations, and they have a responsibility to uphold the values and objectives of their employer. This can include producing content that aligns with the organization's editorial policies, covering stories that are of interest to their target audience, and generating revenue through advertising or other means. Ultimately, their work contributes to the success and sustainability of the media outlet.

2. Responsibilities to the viewing public: Journalists also have a fundamental responsibility to the viewing public. They play a crucial role in providing accurate, unbiased, and timely information that is essential for an informed society. Journalists should act as watchdogs, holding those in power accountable, uncovering important stories, and representing diverse perspectives. The public relies on journalists to provide them with factual information to make informed decisions and understand the world around them.

Now, regarding examples of news being withheld for the good of the public or vice versa for profit/ratings:

1. Withholding news for the public good: In some cases, news organizations may choose to withhold certain information if its release could jeopardize national security, public safety, or ongoing investigations. For instance, during times of war or terrorist activities, the media may limit reporting specific details that could aid the enemy or endanger lives. This is done to protect the public interest and maintain national security.

2. Prioritizing profit/ratings over public interest: News organizations may sometimes prioritize profit and ratings over the public interest, leading to sensationalism, biased reporting, or withholding crucial information. For example, some media outlets may prioritize sensational or controversial stories to attract more viewers or readership, rather than providing substantive coverage of important issues. This can result in a misrepresentation of facts or neglect of critical topics that would truly serve the public interest.

However, it is important to note that these examples are not absolute and can vary depending on the specific circumstances, professional ethics, and individual journalists or media outlets.

I hope this helps clarify the responsibilities of journalists and the potential conflicts that may arise. Let me know if you have any further questions!