which is probably the most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil?
a)coal is a preferable resource to oil.
b)the possible harm to the balance of nature is more important than the gain in energy.
I believe Bob Pursley answered this question earlier. I don't remember the exact quote but it went something like this. "There is the possibility of a busted oil line." That should answer your question.
so should the answer be b?
yes
The most significant argument against offshore drilling for oil is b) the possible harm to the balance of nature is more important than the gain in energy. This argument is based on the concern that offshore drilling poses significant risks to the environment and ecosystems.
To understand this argument, one can conduct research by examining various sources such as scientific studies, environmental reports, and expert opinions. These sources provide comprehensive information on the potential negative impacts of offshore drilling, including oil spills, pollution, habitat destruction, and disturbance to marine life.
By evaluating the information, one can create a well-informed opinion about the significance of the environmental risks associated with offshore drilling. Additionally, learning about alternative energy sources, such as renewable energy technologies like solar and wind power, can further support the argument against offshore drilling. Ultimately, considering both the environmental consequences and the available alternatives helps to form a comprehensive perspective on this issue.