Why didn't Native Americans like signing papers. HA HA sorry I asked earlier. But my partner just called me and said she didn't find her answer. =P
Hmmm . . . This question was posted by Ashley, answered by BobPursley, and Ashley responded to it.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1191798189
Yeah I know....I posted it. =D
The question you asked is a generalization and may not accurately reflect the attitudes and practices of all Native Americans throughout history. However, if you're curious about Native American historical perspectives on signing papers or treaties, it's important to approach it with cultural sensitivity and recognize the diversity of Native American tribes and traditions.
To understand why Native Americans may have been hesitant or cautious about signing treaties or agreements, it's helpful to consider historical context. Many Native American tribes had a deep connection to their ancestral lands and a strong sense of communal ownership. Traditional Native American cultures often operated through oral agreements, consensus-building, and communal decision-making processes, rather than written contracts. Therefore, the concept of signing papers or treaties imposed by European colonizers may have been unfamiliar and seen as a potential threat to their way of life and sovereignty.
Additionally, historical events such as broken promises, land seizures, forced relocations, and loss of cultural autonomy have created a deep mistrust between Native American tribes and the U.S. government. These historical experiences contribute to a reluctance to sign agreements that may be perceived as further compromising their rights, land, or self-determination.
It's important to engage with diverse sources and perspectives, including Native American voices, to gain a more nuanced understanding of this topic.