Rewrite the biconditional as a conditional statement and its converse and then determine if the biconditional is an accurate definition:

Two angles are supplementary if and only if they form a linear pair

conditional:_____________________________
converse:________________________________
Accurate definition? yes or no

i'm trying i'm just posting the questions up so I can compare other peoples work to mine to see if im correct cause i don't want to turn in my homework and get an f again

ohhhhh. i thought you were just like "do my homework"! i understand. sorry i was rude.

Alan -- please post your work. We're much more willing to check your work than to give you answers.

oh i get that alot

ok i'll start doing that from now on

To rewrite the biconditional statement as a conditional statement and its converse, we need to break it down and understand its components.

The given biconditional statement is: "Two angles are supplementary if and only if they form a linear pair."

In this statement, we have two parts:
1) If two angles are supplementary, then they form a linear pair.
2) If two angles form a linear pair, then they are supplementary.

Now let's rewrite these parts as the conditional statement and its converse:

Conditional Statement:
If two angles are supplementary, then they form a linear pair.

Converse Statement:
If two angles form a linear pair, then they are supplementary.

To determine if the biconditional is an accurate definition, we need to verify if both the conditional statement and its converse are both true. In this case, if both statements hold true, it implies that the original biconditional statement is an accurate definition.

In this case, the statement "Two angles are supplementary if and only if they form a linear pair" is indeed an accurate definition because both the conditional statement and its converse hold true.

do you really not get ANY of your geometry homework? are you even trying?