Offer evidence to prove that the Congo Free State violated Articles I, V, and VI of the Berlin Act of 1885.
Here's the answer that GuruBlue posted a few days ago.
http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1186771696
To offer evidence that the Congo Free State violated Articles I, V, and VI of the Berlin Act of 1885, we need to understand what these articles entail.
Article I of the Berlin Act states that the "trade of all nations shall enjoy complete freedom." To find evidence of a violation of this article, we need to look for instances where the Congo Free State limited or hindered trade with other nations. This can be done by researching historical records, reports, and testimonies that document any restrictions or barriers imposed on foreign traders or their goods in the Congo Free State during that time.
Article V of the Berlin Act emphasizes that no power should "annex or colonize" African territories. To provide evidence of a violation of this article, we can examine historical sources that demonstrate instances of the Congo Free State being treated as a colony or territory under the rule of a foreign power. This might include official documents, diplomatic correspondences, or accounts from eyewitnesses that suggest the Congo Free State was effectively colonized, such as the imposition of foreign laws, administration, or exploitation of its resources by a foreign power.
Article VI of the Berlin Act aims to protect native tribes and their rights. Evidence to prove a violation of this article can be found in various sources that indicate the mistreatment or abuse of native Congolese tribes by the agents or authorities of the Congo Free State. This could include eyewitness testimonies, reports from missionaries, explorers, or human rights organizations, as well as official documents like decrees or policies that violated the rights of the natives.
It is important to note that the Berlin Act of 1885 was intended to promote humanitarian ideals and regulate European colonial activities in Africa. However, it does not explicitly detail the specific consequences or mechanisms for enforcing its provisions. Therefore, gathering solid evidence may require extensive research and analysis of various historical sources.