"Either you are for me or agsinst me."
is this a hasty generalization, begging the question, faulty cause, false dilemma, or faulty analogy.
can some 1 help me
http://academic.cuesta.edu/acasupp/as/404.htm
Scroll down and check out the either/or explanation. Whenever someone must choose between two things, it's called a dilemma. You'll need to decide if this fits.
You can also look up the different terms at http://www.answers.com
=)
Here is more information that might be helpful:
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/DecisionTrap.html
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
Based on the statement "Either you are for me or against me," it can be classified as a false dilemma. A false dilemma occurs when only two options are presented as if they are the only possibilities, even though other options may exist. In this case, the statement suggests that there are only two options available – being for someone or being against them – with no consideration given to other possible perspectives or positions.
To determine the correct classification for the statement, you can follow these steps:
1. Understand the definitions of the different fallacies being considered. In this case, the options are hasty generalization, begging the question, faulty cause, false dilemma, and faulty analogy.
2. Examine the statement and consider its structure and content. In this case, the statement presents two opposing options and suggests that there are no other alternatives available.
3. Compare the statement to the definitions of the different fallacies. Based on its structure and content, the statement corresponds most closely to the definition of a false dilemma.
4. Refer to reliable sources for further clarification and understanding. The websites provided in the response can offer additional information on the different fallacies and help in further understanding their characteristics.
Remember to critically analyze the statement and the options available to determine the most appropriate classification.