You are an anthropologist conducting research with prostitutes on HIV/AIDS. You uncover evidence of an illegal activity (other than prostitution) involving both informants and businesses in the area. When you bring this to your research team’s attention, team members who live in the community tell you that reporting this activity could result in community members losing some services or benefits. Read the American Anthropological Association’s Code of Ethics What do you do? Please explain your reasoning. Where did you learn the ideas that form the basis of your opinion? (Most people will respond, "From my parents" or "From my upbringing." Try to think about other influences on your thinking as well.) Try to argue the opposite point of view.
When you have your response written up, someone here will be able to critique your thinking.
=)
Consider the positive and negative aspects of reporting the activity and these same aspects for not reporting the activity.
Use your value system to guage the relative importance of these aspects.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
As an anthropologist conducting research on HIV/AIDS among prostitutes, I understand the ethical dilemma presented by uncovering evidence of illegal activities involving informants and businesses in the community. In this situation, it is crucial to consider the potential consequences of reporting the activity versus not reporting it.
Considering the American Anthropological Association's Code of Ethics, the primary responsibility is to the individuals and communities being studied. However, it should be noted that the Code does not explicitly address the reporting of illegal activities. Therefore, it is necessary to approach this dilemma by weighing various factors and considering multiple perspectives.
The first step is to analyze the potential positive and negative consequences of reporting the illegal activity. Reporting may lead to legal actions, which can help address the illicit behaviors and potentially protect the community's well-being. It might also promote a sense of justice and accountability. On the other hand, reporting may jeopardize the provision of essential services or benefits for the community, particularly if some members rely on those involved in illegal activities.
To make an informed decision, it is important to consider one's own values and the values embedded in the Code of Ethics. These values might include respect for individuals and communities, promotion of well-being, fairness, and social justice. By assessing the relative importance of these values, one can determine the best course of action.
In terms of the influences on my thinking, I have learned the ideas that form the basis of my opinion through various sources beyond just my upbringing. These include academic studies, research in social sciences, exposure to diverse perspectives, engagement with professional ethics codes, and discussions with colleagues and mentors in the field of anthropology.
Arguing the opposite viewpoint, one might consider the potential harm that reporting the illegal activity could cause to the community. This harm might manifest in the loss of services, benefits, or trust within the community. Additionally, reporting could create a hostile environment for researchers and hinder future efforts to conduct research and implement interventions to address HIV/AIDS.
In summary, when faced with the dilemma of reporting illegal activity uncovered during anthropological research, it is essential to carefully consider the potential positive and negative consequences, while also aligning one's decision with personal values and the ethical principles of the field. It is advisable to consult with research team members and organizations that can offer guidance specific to the situation, taking into account the unique circumstances of the community and the potential long-term impact of the decision.