A revolution is an overthrow of the government or politic system by the people who they govern. Violence is an act of aggression and anger. Violence is never the way for justice; but according to a reactionary violence is the way. They argue violent revolutions are justified because the country they live in would be improved. For example the French revolution of 1789 this was when Louis XVI was overthrown and Republic was put into order.
While a radical disagrees entirely; they oppose any sort of violence. They disagree because there are many revolutions that barley have violence and they have succeeded; for instance The Russian Revolution of 1917 when the February revolution overthrows Tsar Nicholas II in Russia. On they other hand there are some who are undecided like the moderates. So who are right the moderates, radicals or reactionarys?
A revolution is the overthrow of a government or politic system by the people whom they govern. Violence is an act of aggression and anger. Violence is never the way for justice; but according to a reactionary, violence is the way. They argue violent revolutions are justified because the country they live in would be improved. For example the French revolution of 1789 , this was when Louis XVI was overthrown and Republic was put into order.
While a radical disagrees entirely; they oppose any sort of violence. They disagree because there are many revolutions that barley have violence and they have succeeded; for instance The Russian Revolution of 1917 when the February revolution overthrows Tsar Nicholas II in Russia. ( the previous section does not make sense in light of what you have said previously.) On they other hand there are some who are undecided like the moderates. So who are right the moderates, radicals or reactionarys?
*******
You need to reorganize. You have not said what moderates would do to change government. Are radicals and reactionaries the same? Take a sheet of paper and separate it into moderates and radicals... write what each does to change the status quo. Then you can have a better organized paper when you write it.
A revolution is an overthrow of the government or politic"al" Need adjective. system by the people whom they govern. Violence is an act of aggression and anger. Violence is never the way for justice; but according to a reactionaryComma violence is the way. TheyBe consistent in using singular or plural. argue violent revolutions are justifiedComma because the country they live in would be improved. For exampleComma the French revolution of 1789 thisDelete "this." was when Louis XVI was overthrown and Republic was put into order.
If you don't indent paragraphs, Skip a line to indicate new paragraph.
While a radical disagrees entirely; they oppose any sort of violence. Be consistent in using singular or plural. They disagree because there are many revolutions that barleySp have violence and they have succeeded; for instanceComma The Russian Revolution of 1917Comma when the February revolution overthrows Tsar Nicholas II in Russia. On theySp other handComma there are some who are undecided like the moderates. So who are right— the moderates, radicals or reactionarysSp?
To review your terms, see:
http://www.usnewsclassroom.com/resources/activities/act010604.html
You also need to make better use of commas.
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_comma.html
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/grammar/g_commaproof.html
In the future, if nobody is available to proofread your work, you can do this yourself. After writing your material, put it aside for a day — at least several hours. (This breaks mental sets you might have that keep you from noticing problems.) Then read it aloud as if you were reading someone else's work. (Reading aloud slows down your reading, so you are less likely to skip over problems.)
If your reading goes smoothly, that is fine. However, wherever you "stumble" in your reading, other persons are likely to have a problem in reading your material. Those "stumbles" indicate areas that need revising.
Once you have made your revisions, repeat the process above. Good papers often require many drafts.
I hope this helps a little more. Thanks for asking.
The question of whether the moderates, radicals, or reactionaries are right in their approach to revolution is a complex and subjective one. Each group has its own beliefs and ideologies, and their opinions on the use of violence in revolutions vary.
Moderates generally advocate for gradual and peaceful change. They believe in working within the existing system to bring about reforms and improvements. Moderates often argue that violence in revolutions can lead to chaos and instability, and may not result in lasting change. They believe in compromise and gradual progress.
Radicals, on the other hand, believe in more drastic and immediate change. They may support the use of violence in revolutions, viewing it as a necessary means to achieve their goals. Radicals argue that violence can be a powerful tool to dismantle oppressive systems and create a more just society. They often draw inspiration from successful nonviolent revolutions, such as the civil rights movement in the United States or the Indian independence movement led by Mahatma Gandhi.
Reactionaries, also known as counter-revolutionaries, are against any kind of revolution or significant change in the political system. They often support the existing order and oppose attempts to challenge or overthrow it. Reactionaries argue that violent revolutions can lead to anarchy and instability, and that the status quo should be maintained.
It is important to note that the success or failure of a revolution cannot be solely attributed to the use of violence or the lack thereof. Many factors, such as the socio-political context, leadership, popular support, and external influences, can impact the outcome of a revolution. Additionally, the interpretation of whether a revolution was successful or not can vary depending on one's perspective and goals.
Ultimately, the question of which approach is right depends on individual beliefs, values, and the specific context of a revolution. There is no one-size-fits-all answer.