If a person is injured as a result of an unreasonably dangerous or defective product, how will he or she most likely recover damages for the injury?
a) hold the retailer of the product strictly liable.
b) hold the wholesaler strictly liable
c) hold the manufacturer strictly liable
d) all of these
i think it's c.
I agree.
You are correct. The most likely way for an injured person to recover damages for an injury caused by an unreasonably dangerous or defective product is by holding the manufacturer strictly liable. This means that the injured person does not have to prove negligence or fault on the part of the manufacturer, but only needs to show that the product was defective and that the defect caused their injury. Strict liability helps protect consumers and holds manufacturers accountable for the safety of their products.
To arrive at this answer, we can apply the legal principle of strict liability. Strict liability holds manufacturers responsible for injuries caused by their products, regardless of whether they were negligent in their actions. This principle is based on the idea that manufacturers are in the best position to ensure the safety of their products and should be held accountable if their products harm consumers. Holding retailers or wholesalers strictly liable is less likely because they are not typically responsible for the design or manufacturing process of the product.