Wednesday
July 30, 2014

Homework Help: Philosophy

Posted by Anne on Wednesday, December 13, 2006 at 7:58pm.

a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and show tables) determine and state whether the following arguments are valid, briefly explaining your table; and b) if valid, demonstrate validity by deductions using Group I rules.

Arg

1. P-->Q
2. ~P ^:~Q

Answer this Question

First Name:
School Subject:
Answer:

Related Questions

Philosophy - a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and ...
Philosophy - a) Using long or short truth tables (symbolize as necessary and ...
Phil103 Informal Logic - . If P is false, and Q is false, the truth-value of "P...
Phi103 - What is the truth value of the sentence "P v ~ P"? (Points : 1) True ...
phi103 - 1. A conditional sentence with a false antecedent is always (Points : ...
Informal Logic-Pls chk ans - The sentence "P → Q" is read as (3) P or Q P ...
Logic - The sentence "P → Q" is read as (3) P or Q P and Q If P then Q Q ...
philosophy - Truth tables can determine which of the following? (Points : 1) If ...
PHI103: Informal Logic - 1) In the truth table for an invalid argument, Student ...
Phil103 Informal Logic - 1. Question : "~ P v Q" is best read as Student Answer...

Search
Members