Q: Who claimed that our subjection to pain and pleasure should be the foundation for our laws?

a. Simone de Beauvoir
b. Kant
c. Jeremy Bentham
d. Peter Singer
e. Aristippus

I think it is C, but i am not sure about E... or possibly the other ones. Thank u!

E. is my sons vague guess look in to him

The correct answer is c. Jeremy Bentham. He was a British philosopher and jurist who argued that the basis of our laws should be the principle of maximizing happiness and minimizing suffering for all individuals. This ethical theory is known as utilitarianism.

To determine the answer to this question, you could have used a few different approaches:

1. Knowledge and recall: If you were familiar with the works and ideas of prominent philosophers, you might have recognized Jeremy Bentham as someone who proposed utilitarianism as the foundation for laws.

2. Research: If you were unsure about the answer, you could have conducted a quick search online or consulted reliable sources like books or articles to find the philosopher who advocated for subjection to pain and pleasure as the basis for our laws. In this case, searching for "philosopher who claimed our subjection to pain and pleasure should be the foundation for our laws" would lead you to Jeremy Bentham.

3. Process of elimination: By excluding other options, you could have arrived at the correct answer. For example, Simone de Beauvoir was a feminist philosopher, Kant emphasized duty and morality based on reason, Peter Singer is an influential ethicist known for his work on animal rights, and Aristippus was a Greek philosopher associated with hedonism. By dismissing these options, you would have deduced that Jeremy Bentham is the most likely answer.

Regarding option e, Aristippus, while he is associated with the hedonistic approach to ethics, he did not specifically argue that our subjection to pain and pleasure should be the foundation for our laws. Therefore, it is not the correct answer.

As for your son's guess, it's great that he is engaging in the question, but in this case, it is not the correct answer.