i posted yesturday and the website i was directed to was for the 1800s. i need to know how nullification was still going on in the 1900s, but it can't be jury nullification

Did you investigate the states rights' issues during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s?

At that time, the Southern states insisted that their states' rights took precedence over the Supreme Court's ruling against school desegregation.

The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) declared that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. However, many Southern states refused to comply with the ruling, citing their right to nullify federal laws. This was known as the "nullification crisis" of the 1960s.

The federal government eventually prevailed, but the issue of states' rights and nullification remained a contentious issue throughout the 1960s and beyond.

Yes, during the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, nullification was still a topic of discussion and controversy. However, it is important to note that the nullification I mentioned earlier referred to jury nullification specific to the 1800s.

In the 1960s, some Southern states implemented strategies to resist the desegregation of schools following the Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. These strategies were based on the belief that states' rights allowed them to resist federal interference in matters related to education and racial segregation.

One such strategy was known as "interposition," which involved states passing laws or resolutions asserting their authority to nullify federal laws they considered unconstitutional. For example, in response to the Supreme Court's ruling, Southern states passed laws that defied desegregation orders and upheld racially segregated schools. This defiance was rooted in the idea that states had the right to interpret and enforce the law as they saw fit, regardless of federal mandates.

The attempts to nullify federal laws and resist desegregation were met with legal challenges and eventually overturned in the courts. The Supreme Court consistently ruled in favor of federal authority and against states' rights arguments used to support segregation and nullification tactics.

It is worth noting that nullification as a political strategy has been used throughout American history on various issues, but particularly during times of intense conflict over federal versus state powers, such as during the 1800s and 1960s.

To find out how nullification was still going on in the 1900s, specifically during the Civil Rights Movement, you can start by researching the states' rights issues during that time.

1. Begin by searching for information on the Civil Rights Movement in the 1960s.
- Look for reliable sources like books, scholarly articles, or reputable websites that provide historical context.

2. Focus on examining the Southern states' stance on states' rights during the Civil Rights Movement.
- Look for information on how they justified their belief that their states' rights took precedence over federal laws and court rulings.

3. Pay attention to instances where Southern states used nullification as a means to resist or undermine the enforcement of federal laws, specifically regarding school desegregation.
- Look for specific examples of how these states tried to nullify the Supreme Court's ruling against school desegregation, such as through implementing state laws or policies that circumvented or ignored the court's decision.

4. Consider exploring the legal battles and court cases related to the states' rights and nullification during the Civil Rights Movement.
- Look for landmark cases or legal arguments made by Southern states to support their position on states' rights.

5. With the gathered information, analyze and draw conclusions about how nullification was a tool employed by some Southern states during the 1900s.
- Consider the motivations, the legal strategies, and the broader implications of these actions.

Remember to critically evaluate your sources, prioritize reputable and scholarly information, and cross-reference different perspectives to ensure a thorough understanding of the topic.