Posted by **Azlin** on Tuesday, September 12, 2006 at 4:14pm.

I need help with this.

Use the Law Of Syllogism to determine a conclusion from statements 1 & 2.

1. All squares are rhombuses

2. The diagonals of a rhombus are perpendicular.

What can we say about the diagonals of all squares then?

the diagonals of all squares are perpendicular.

You got it.

It might be useful to know too that squares are the the intersection of rectangles and rhombuses. They have all the properites of both sets.

For your syllogism question, if something is true for a set or collection, as it is here for rhombuses, then it's true for all members of any subset, in this case squares.

That seems so simple. I guess the way I read it just confused me a bit.

Thank you!

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- Math - If a rectangle has four congruent sides, it is a square. A square has ...
- geometry - Which of the following statements is not always true? A. In a rhombus...
- Math - Which of the following statements is not always true? A. In a rhombus, ...
- geometry - I honestly need help on this question. Determine whether statement(3...
- geometry - Given: QRST is a parallelogram. Prove: QRST is a square. Complete ...
- Geometry - Are the diagonals of a parallelogram perpendicular? Why or why not? ...
- Geometry - Are the diagonals of a parallelogram perpendicular? Why or why not? ...
- Geometry - I had to fill out a chart stating the properties of certine shapes(...
- geometry - The diagonals of a rhombus are in 2:1. If the perimeter of the ...
- Geometry - I had to fill out a chart stating the properties of certine shapes(...

More Related Questions