What are some advantages-for both the reviewer and writer-of peer reviews? How would you encourage a reluctant peer reviewer?
Thank you for using the Jiskha Homework Help Forum. First of all, most of us hate to find our OWN mistakes! It is much more fun to find other people's mistakes! By doing this it becomes a type of "scavenger hunt" and some advantages are: to learn the types of common mistakes in writing, because then you can avoid these kinds of errors. An important aspect is to write a positive review as we like to hear "positive reinforcement" and usually tune out "negative" comments. To encourage my students I required at least one peer review per essay. Then, not only did the "author" of the essay have the opportunity to correct errors before I got the paper, but the reviewer also earned extra points for all the helpful comments.
I couldn't bring up SraJMcGin's response, so I searched Google under the key words "peer review high school" to get these possible sources:
http://www.swc.utexas.edu/highschool/hspeerreview.shtml
http://turnitin.com/static/peerreview.html
http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/9/c018.html
Unfortunately most of the articles are on higher level scientific review processes and there is a periodical called Peer Review.
Although both the reviewer and reviewee may be afraid of making mistakes, this is part of the learning process and part of growth. See this site:
http://www.members.cox.net/dagershaw/lol/Flunk.htm
I hope this helps. Thanks for asking.
What are some advantages- for both the reviewer and writer- of peer reviews?
Peer reviews have several advantages for both the reviewer and the writer. For the reviewer, it provides an opportunity to develop critical thinking skills and evaluate someone else's work. It allows them to analyze and reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of the writing, which in turn helps them improve their own writing skills. Additionally, peer reviews can enhance their understanding of the subject matter and provide exposure to different perspectives and writing styles.
For the writer, peer reviews offer valuable feedback from someone in the same position, who can understand the challenges and struggles they may face. It allows them to identify any weaknesses in their writing and make necessary improvements. Peer reviews also provide an opportunity for collaboration and exchange of ideas. They can receive suggestions and ideas that they may not have thought of themselves, which can lead to a more well-rounded and polished piece of writing.
To encourage a reluctant peer reviewer, it's important to create a supportive and non-threatening environment. Here are a few strategies:
1. Explain the benefits: Emphasize the advantages of peer reviews, such as the opportunity to improve their own writing, develop critical thinking skills, and learn from others. Highlight how it can be a valuable learning experience for both parties involved.
2. Set clear expectations: Provide guidelines and criteria for the review process. This can help the reluctant reviewer feel more confident in their ability to provide constructive feedback. Make it clear that their role is not to criticize, but rather to offer suggestions and identify areas for improvement.
3. Promote reciprocity: Encourage the reluctant reviewer by emphasizing that they will also receive peer reviews in return. Emphasize the mutual benefit and the opportunity for their own work to be improved through feedback from others.
4. Provide examples: Show examples of effective peer reviews and explain how they can be helpful. This can help the reluctant reviewer understand the purpose and value of the process.
5. Offer support and guidance: Be available to answer any questions or concerns the reluctant reviewer may have. Provide resources or additional materials to help them feel more prepared and confident in their ability to provide feedback.
By employing these strategies, you can help reluctant peer reviewers understand the advantages of the process and encourage their active participation.