What is the role of rhetoric in influencing people's attitudes and beliefs? How can readers's distinguish between prejudicial and nonprejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

Check this site.

http://www.jessanderson.org/doc/rr_lingo.html

To persuade people into believing a certain way. A bias or unbias attempt to persuade. The use of propaganda in an attempt to change beliefs. Distinquish between the logical force and the psychological forcel. Be wary of slanting techniques in persuasion.

What is the role of rhetoric in influencing people's attitudes and beliefs? How can readers distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices?

How can readers distinguish between prejudical and non-prejudical use of rhetorial devices?

Here is other valuable sites. http://www.jiskha.com/display.cgi?id=1157494639

(Broken Link Removed)

The role of rhetoric in influencing people's attitudes and beliefs is to persuade and shape public opinion. Rhetorical devices such as emotional appeals, persuasive language, and logical arguments are used to influence people's thoughts, attitudes, and beliefs on various subjects.

To distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices, readers can consider the following:

1. Logical coherence: Pay attention to the logical consistency of arguments presented. Prejudicial use of rhetoric often relies on fallacies or invalid reasoning, whereas non-prejudicial use strives for logical consistency and relies on sound reasoning.

2. Emotional manipulation: Assess whether the rhetoric appeals to emotions in a balanced and reasonable manner or if it manipulates emotions to create bias or prejudice. Non-prejudicial use of rhetoric aims to evoke empathy or understanding, while prejudicial use often uses inflammatory language or appeals to fear and stereotypes.

3. Unbiased evidence: Look for the presence of reliable and unbiased evidence to support claims made through rhetoric. Non-prejudicial rhetoric relies on facts, research, and diverse perspectives, whereas prejudicial rhetoric may cherry-pick evidence or present biased sources.

4. Consideration of multiple viewpoints: Determine if the rhetoric acknowledges and addresses opposing viewpoints or if it dismisses them without fair consideration. Non-prejudicial use of rhetoric engages in respectful dialogue and encourages open-mindedness, while prejudicial use tends to ignore or discredit opposing perspectives.

By critically analyzing these factors, readers can develop a better understanding of when rhetoric is used to manipulate or inform, and thereby distinguish between prejudicial and non-prejudicial use of rhetorical devices.