Hill and Terrell owned two adjacent lots together. They sold one tract to Dr. Bowman. Their agreement provided that when Hill and Terrell paved their parking lot, Bowman would also pave his adjacent lot so that the parties would have one large interconnecting parking lot. After the agreement was made, Hill and Terrell sold their lot to a buyer, who constructed a building where the parking lot would have been. Bowman then sued Hill and Terrell, claiming that they had broken their contract. Are Hill and Terrell liable for breach of contract? and why or why not?

To determine whether Hill and Terrell are liable for breach of contract, we can analyze the following elements:

1. Existence of a contract: We need to establish whether there was a valid contract between Hill, Terrell, and Dr. Bowman. To do this, we would need to examine the terms of their agreement, including any written or verbal agreements, and determine if there was a mutual understanding and meeting of the minds.

2. Terms of the contract: We need to review the terms of the agreement to see if there were any specific obligations or conditions that Hill, Terrell, and Dr. Bowman must fulfill. In this case, the agreement stated that when Hill and Terrell paved their parking lot, Bowman would also pave his adjacent lot.

3. Performance of the contract: We need to determine whether Hill, Terrell, and Dr. Bowman fulfilled their respective obligations as stated in the contract. Hill and Terrell sold their lot to a buyer who constructed a building, but it is not clear whether they paved the parking lot as agreed. We also need to verify if Dr. Bowman paved his adjacent lot.

Based on the given information, it seems that Hill and Terrell may be liable for breach of contract if they did not pave their parking lot as agreed upon in the contract. However, it would also depend on the specific language and terms of the contract. If the contract stated that the paving of the parking lot was a condition precedent to the sale of their lot, then their failure to complete that obligation could result in a breach of contract.

It's important to note that the specific wording and details of the contract are crucial in determining liability for breach. Consulting a legal professional would provide a more accurate assessment based on the specific circumstances and legal jurisdiction involved.