Posted by **Jermaine Busby** on Wednesday, August 3, 2005 at 2:28am.

Hill and Terrell owned two adjacent lots together. They sold one tract to Dr. Bowman. Their agreement provided that when Hill and Terrell paved their parking lot, Bowman would also pave his adjacent lot so that the parties would have one large interconnecting parking lot. After the agreement was made, Hill and Terrell sold their lot to a buyer, who constructed a building where the parking lot would have been. Bowman then sued Hill and Terrell, claiming that they had broken their contract. Are Hill and Terrell liable for breach of contract? and why or why not?

## Answer This Question

## Related Questions

- trig - h t t p : / / i m g 4 0 . i m a g e s h a c k . u s / c o n t e n t . p h...
- math - a rectangular parking lot is 110 yards long and 45 yard wide it costs ...
- math - Terrell has a water purifier for backpacking. It will purify 1 liter of ...
- oblique triangle trigonometry - A parking lot has the shape of a parallelogram. ...
- math - Two coworkers picked up some writing instruments at the office supply ...
- Physics- Exercise 10 - A 500kg pig is standing at the top of a muddy hill on a ...
- physics - a truck with a mass of 1,500 kg is parked on a hill with a slope of 7 ...
- physics - a truck with a mass of 1,500 kg is parked on a hill with a slope of 7 ...
- Math - A parking lot is 60 meters wide and 80 meters long. At $ 15 per square ...
- Math - Everyone in Mrs. Bowman's art class has 8 jars of paint ecept Jerome, who...

More Related Questions