Questions LLC
Login
or
Sign Up
Ask a New Question
Interpretation of Statutes
Questions (6)
What is meant in Ontario and some other Canadian jurisdictions by the ‘inconsistent use’
test? Based on the case law
1 answer
asked by
oyebode222222
62 views
In Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) the court referred to section 35(3) of the Interim Constitution (the
1 answer
asked anonymously
7 views
In Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) the court referred to section 35(3) of the Interim Constitution (the
1 answer
asked anonymously
5 views
In Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) the court referred to section 35(3) of the Interim Constitution (the
1 answer
asked anonymously
3 views
In Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) the court referred to section 35(3) of the Interim Constitution (the
1 answer
asked anonymously
4 views
In Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W) the court referred to section 35(3) of the Interim Constitution (the
1 answer
asked anonymously
8 views
Subcategories (1)
Inconsistent Use Test
Parent Categories (2)
Constitutional Law
Legal/Case Law
